Traditional and contemporary buildings

Peter’s Basilica. This paper seeks to compare and contrast the two buildings looking at joints, connections and member sizes. Bespoke Design against Woodhouse Barn Homes The construction of Tamedia office building used metallic screws to join pieces of wood. These metallic screws come in various sizes depending, on the joint to be connected. This method of joining pieces of wood has been hailed for providing strength to the building. The building hosts over 480 employees. The old St. Peter’s Basilica remains one of the most significant buildings of the renaissance. The building became a Centre for religious activities considering its strategic location (Bolgia et al, 2011). The building got constructed by Donato Bramante and Carlo Maderno. During its construction, strength and stiffness models got developed with a view to creating methods that will later be used by engineers in construction. Mortice and tenon geometry could be adopted from a reference face. Joints could be then made by use of sticking glue. This made most of the buildings constructed to lack durability as they glue would become weak with time. Construction of St. Peter’s Basilica further used test failures, which could be employed as an approach of examining the strength and stiffness of the proposed building. The resin got used to freeze connections. The church got constructed in such a way that it could hold up to 3000 worshippers at any time. One outstanding difference between the two buildings is the main objective of each of the buildings. The main objective of the old St. Peter’s basilica can be seen to have been durability and capacity. The building could hold a large number of worshippers and had structures that guaranteed its durability. The construction of the Tamedia office building, on the other hand, had an objective of ensuring that while the building remained strong in the long run, the building retains the aspect of modernity and class. The building possesses a Japanese craftsmanship. The glazed volume of the building gets topped by a mansard roof. Another aspect that differentiates the two buildings is the wood used to construct each of the buildings. The old St. Peter used hardwood timber in its construction (Bolgia et al, 2011). Hardwood was the common timber as compared to softwood. Traditional preservatives could be added to the timber to ensure the durability of the building. The Tameda building, on the other hand, used softwood that could be purposely grown for building construction. One advantage that came with the use of softwood is its flexibility. Unlike hardwood, softwood could be used to make varying construction models. Contrary to most buildings of the renaissance, the old St. Peter, applied was a daring construction that favored extra-thick walls. This was unlike the basic concepts of engineering. Windows in the outer section of the aisles filtered light into the building although the main source of lighting to in the building came from the nave clerestory (Sobocinski et al, 2005). A total of eleven windows could be aligned with a pattern of interchanging intercolumniation. The construction of the ceiling and the roof, however, still remains unclear. Several texts have been found that seek to explain how the roof and the ceiling got constructed. One term used by most of these texts is lacunars which get used to refer to a coffered ceiling. The Tamedia building, on the